Blog

Just another one of my ramblings.....

Lover Of Nice People

Another Man Behind a Face

110

Yesterday I showed you the true man behind the face with regards to the Madeleine Foundation’s secretary Tony Bennett, and it wasn’t a pretty sight was it?

I have not had much dealings with the person who is being featured in today’s post. They are relatively new to me. To be honest, I don’t know as much as others do about this person, but what I have seen so far, again doesn’t make pleasant reading.

In fact, to read the tirade of posts that this person produces, in what little I have seen, is enough to make the strongest of stomachs turn.

So therefore for those that know more information about this person please leave your comments and links to proof of his behaviour below and I will add them to this post.

Here we go are you ready?  Same procedure as yesterday, close your eyes, clear your mind and when you are ready open your eyes and read more.

What do you see?

I see.

  • A man who runs a blog under the name of “Lover of Nice People” yet doesn’t have a decent word to say about anyone.
  • A man who runs a blog and in it’s description states, “This blog is NOT an attack against Kate and Gerry McCann”, very true he does it on Facebook with comments like this screenshot, wishing the mother of a missing child would have an accident along with a reporter and die.
  • A man who also has posted jokes mocking the mother of a missing child on Facebook, screenshot.
  • A man who wishes death on someone who is ill and repeatedly asks in his posts “Has (name removed) snuffed it yet?” and continues his abhorrent behaviour by stating he knows certain people in a certain place with full bladders waiting to pee on their grave.  His words not mine.
  • A man who tells lies, by stating that the McCann’s asked the Express to remove a photo of themselves smiling, only to be caught out lying  by another site who took the initiative of contacting the Express and ascertaining the correct information. That information being  that the McCanns or their spokesman NEVER made any requests to the Express for that photo to be removed.
  • A man who will blog the most horrendous posts about anyone he dislikes and then allows myths to turn into fact, to the extent that a person gets threatened with violence, due to him getting things so wrong and writing nothing but lies about a person.
  • A man who doesn’t care about the age of a person he picks on, even children are victims of his online hate posts, all because that child supports the family of a missing child.  And all because that child wants to keep the profile of missing Madeleine McCann in the media spotlight, in hope that this missing child is found and reunited with her family.
  • A man who craves attention so bad, that even nasty comments about himself satisfies his hunger for attention.
  • A man that leads people to believe that by making spelling mistakes it will stop people suing them for libel (screenshot).. Yes if you say so, don’t think the courts will see it that way.
  • A man who has followers, that hang on and believe his every word.  And followers that will wake up one day and realise they are tied to this man for good.  Why? Because breaking free will result in them being his next target.
  • A man who tells people on Facebook that the Sun Newspaper have told him that should a story develop that did not favour the McCanns they would not print it, which implies to people that the Sun are involved in a cover-up (screenshot). Personally I think it is a pile of pants and the Sun never said such a thing.
  • A man who sits there day in and day out monitoring the Find Madeleine Official Campaign page on Facebook, looking for comments of support to the family of a missing child, that he can turn into nasty posts about the person who wrote them.
  • A man who proclaims to have seen photos of myself, now I know for a fact that is a lie, because there are NO photos of myself on the internet.  And if he is in possession of any photos of myself which I know for a fact would have been taken without my express permission, he is in fact invading my privacy and it could be classed as stalking.
  • A man who others say has posted horrendous comments about them, their lives and their friends due to his hate-filled campaign against them.  Some campaigns instigated by this man have lasted for years.
  • A man who proclaims to not know what happened to a missing child but does nothing to stop the agenda of others who state categorically that this missing child is in fact dead and her parents are too blame.

So you see, this man who goes by the name of Lover of Nice People, is not really nice at all, is he?

About the Author

BrenMiddle aged and surrounded by loving friends and family. People who don't sit in judgement and people who care. Well most of the time they do.... Happy to be part of the independent thinking group and a person who refuses to follow others like proverbial sheep. As the saying goes... If you're allergic to bullcrap, drama, head games, liars, & fake people, keep the sneeze going.........I can't wait to see who does all of this next!!!View all posts by Bren

  • Guest

    No he isn’t nice and a few of his ‘friends’ are waking up to it, but only once he turned his foul-mouthed venom on them.
    He has got so used to writing lies in his salacious books about famous (mainly dead) people that he imagines he can talk crap on end for weeks and no-one will notice.

    Well we did Bret, we did. We noticed your egotistical, attention-seeking, shit-stirring, self-aggrandizing behaviour, and one can only marvel that your biggest supporter – one Mike Hardy, self-proclaimed ‘investigative journalist’ can’t or won’t see what kind of a plonker you really are.

    But then Hardy apparently had an all-day meeting with the subject of the previous feature, Bennett, so he can’t be too fussy about the company he keeps.

  • Sabot

    No, not a nice man at all.  His Mummy should have washed his mouth out with soap.  Preferably Lysol.

  • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

    Hello Guest and Sabot, I have just read on twitter about his attitude to people who have cancer:

    https://twitter.com/#!/justice4maddie/status/123044815473610752

    Anyone that thinks Cancer is a joke and funny seriously needs to seek professional help.  Cancer can strike anybody at any time.  It does not care if you are rich or if you are poor, it will destroy you and it will destroy those around you.

    I lost a very good friend at the age of 36 to cervical cancer.  Those final days of watching her fight this disease with all her might and still lose is something I never want to see again.  The cries of her pain, the injections that sent her into unconsciousness until they wore off.

    I never want to see a young child of 16 break down and sob uncontrollably because there is nothing he can do for his mother’s pain and question why god is making her suffer like his and why doesn’t he take her life and stop her pain.

    Cancer is definitely not funny and definitely doesn’t need people like Bret making a joke about.

  • Sabot

    He has obviously gotten away with his disgusting behaviour for years. because people in the past have been intimidated. 
    Well now, he picked on the wrong bunch this time.  We are all hardened veterans of this sort of carry on.

    PS.  He really ought to look in a mirror.  Or perhaps he can’t stand the sight of his own unfortunate face.

  • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

    Exactly Sabot, we are hardened and it has been a hard lesson for all of us to learn.  People who Bret intimidates probably feel the only escape is to hide away and be quiet.  Bret and people like him are bullies and like bullies they won’t stop until someone stands up to them.

    If his victims run and hide, he gets more power crazy and knows his behaviour and tactics work so increases his online harassment.

    People in real-life, those who really count, know you personally and they know for a fact that what is being written about you is being written by a person with a sick and twisted mind.

    With bullies Sabot you have two options, run and hide or refuse to let yourself be their next victim.

    And people like Bret, get off on the hurt and harm they cause people.  It is sick.  Nobody has to agree with another person’s opinion but each person can agree to disagree in a polite, civil and adult manner. 

    Bret and people like him are too warped in my honest opinion to grasp the basic concept of human interaction and how to respect another person’s right to hold an opinion. 

    He’s the type of person that  likes to throw a firework in the room and then gets his jollies from watching the damage it causes.

    • Sabot

      I don’t think it has got anything to do with opinions, Bren.  I very much doubt that he has any opinions.  He just picks on people he thinks he can hurt.
      He makes up lies about any old thing.  How can that be “Opinions?”

      He is also very stupid if he thinks he can hide his Sock Identities from us who are past masters at spotting this.  The McCanns can safely leave him to us, and especially you.  That was a compliment, by the way.  Just in case you wondered, I think you are doing a great job with him and Bennett.

      His insults are water off a duck’s back, and not even literate.  And his books pamper to the salacious.  However, I have no idea how successful he is because I had never heard of him until he poked his extraordinarily peculiar nose into The McCann Affair.

      My advice to Davis Bret is to carry on, because we are all having a laugh a minute in various places that are unbeknown to him. 

      • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

        Sabot I have this vision of him, stamping his little feet in a paddy, shouting, “Please look at me, look at me, if not I will be naughty and I will be a nasty little boy.”

        He is nothing but an attention-seeker and he doesn’t care what attention he gets, whether it is good or bad, just as long as he gets it, just like a naughty child.

        A bit like Bennett in a way.  Everything Bennett does has to be broadcast, made into a publicity stunt, and then he demands and expects the pats on the back and the adulation.

        Two peas in a pod really, not a lot of difference between them.  Neither of them can stand being criticised and neither of them can stand it when people point out the flaws in their research, sorry lack of research.

        To be honest, I bet all this attention he is getting he is lapping it up.  One sick muppet in my opinion.

        If he or Bennett thinks it is getting them a fan base, then they are seriously deluded as well, as most people will see them for exactly what they are.

        • Sabot

          But these are both grown men, old men in fact.  What on earth can be the matter with them?

          • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

            I am of the firm opinion Sabot, that even if they could find a psychiatrist who was willing to analyse these two, he would himself be in need of counselling.

  • Guest

    It is good to see him getting his comeuppance.  He is a nasty evil sh!t and needs to be eradicated from all forums.  He is supposed to be a writer – I have read better stuff from 5 year olds, and they don’t use foul language or harp on and on about sex and the gay community who, by the way, don’t like him either.   He is worse than bennett;  he has no belief in anything to do with Madeleine or her parents, he is just out to hurt and humiliate anyone he takes a dislike to.  At least bennett seems to have a target and, much as I think he is a sick, deluded fool, if I had to choose between them I would NOT choose bret.  Perhaps the reason for his poking his ugly face into this is because he wants ton write a book?    God forbid, his turgid fiction is barely readable.  

  • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

    Good evening Guest, I have never heard of him until he reared his ugly head recently.  I have never read any of his books and to be perfectly honest if his books read like his blogs, I won’t be reading his books at all.

    Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but it is this abusive and insulting behaviour that is not acceptable.  I always think if you have to abuse and insult then you don’t have much of an argument in debate.

    Insults and abuse are for when you know you can’t argue the point based on facts. 

    I really had to google this person and to be honest, some of things I have seen doesn’t make pleasant reading. 

    And I also think there is a book in this for him and that is what he intends to do, write a book and cash in on another family’s grief. 

    What with dog bowls, vests and T’Shirts promoting cadaver dogs, e-books being sold based on supposition and not facts, ex-detectives selling their theory which is not based on the content of the files,  it seems there are quite a few people out there who want to cash in on this missing child.

  • Sabot

    He is certainly attracting attention at the moment, which might possibly lead to various low life’s buying one of his books.  They are in for a very nasty surprise from what little I have seen.  But it is not possible to Libel The Dead.

    I expect he did think he could write a book about Madeleine, having picked up on all of the rumours, suppositions  and lies from various others of his ilk.  I wouldn’t be at all surprised if he has written it already, and has just been testing the water for reactions.
    Well, he certainly got those.  He won’t get even so far as a publisher.  And we all know what happened to Pat Brown on Amazon.

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      No publisher, if they had any sense would touch him with a barge pole if he wrote about about Madeleine.

      We have seen with our own eyes, in Portugal, the consequences of that.

      By the way does anyone know if the Publichsers Guerra & Paz have got their books back and placed them on the shelves?

      Because if they haven’t it just goes to show they don’t want them back.

      Any publisher once given the green light to put them back out on the shelves would rush to do it, because banned books sell and the publishers would know they could recoup more money because the book is back on the shelves after being banned, than they would if it had not been banned.

  • Guest

    Hello Bren.  I am sure he saw a chance to cash in on the McCanns misery, he likes writing about the dead and if the McCanns were banged up in jail in Portugal he could write what he liked.   He is the equivalent of what is called a ‘shock jock’ on radio; he is deliberate in his comments and just loves it when someone responds, that is when the real evil nastiness comes out.  He doesn’t give a toss about Madeleine; it is nice to see that those who are called antis actually realise they were used, taken in, tricked – call it what you will – my someone with no other desire than to cause misery.  

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      You are right, you have him summed up to a tee.  If the McCanns were in jail they would not be able to fight in the courts what he was writing, because he would claim it was written on what the trial said and their guilty verdict.

      People like him, want to get to know others personally, they want the nitty gritty, they befriend you so that you feel safe and secure and they gather every piece of information they can, in order to use it against you should ever you speak out.

      They are master manipulators and they do it as you say for reaction. 

      Seriously though one question that keeps niggling at me, and I have noticed it since the Baby Irwin disappearance, why do some people make these comments about there being a comparison with the McCann case?  Not one of these people have said “I do hope they find that baby alive and well.” all they have done is tried to tie the two cases together and write two missing kids off as dead.

      I think that “The guilters” article is spot on. 

      • Sabot

        I left a comment on one of the American Blogs about The Irwin Case.  It was deleted within minutes.  And No, it wasn’t abusive, well, not much.
        So another Trial by Public Opinion hits the road.
        This is what the likes of Bret and Bennett do, while making money from other people’s tragedies.

        • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

          Sabot, and do you know what?  Some of them are classing this guy as being suspicious because he didn’t take his phone to work.

          Have they considered phones might not be allowed?  Have they considered he never takes his phone to work?  Have they considered that he forgot it?  No. of course not, that in their eyes, makes him guilty.

          Sabot I have the most unmobile mobile going.  It is either sitting on the worktop keeping the microwave company and if I do remember to take it, it ends up running flat and then shares the same space as my makeup bag in my handbag.

          I am one of these that don’t like being rung when I am in the middle of Morrisons thinking what can we have for dinner this week.

          I don’t like being phoned when I am out enjoying myself.  And I definitely don’t like sitting in people’s company playing stupid games or texting everyone on my address book, telling them I am eating a MacDonalds.  Of course not forgetting I don’t like walking around with it strapped to my right ear when I am out.

          I have however, asked for a Smartphone for Christmas, to wind them up. To which the old man said, “What the *** do you want one of them for, to keep the other company on the worktop I suppose.”

  • Guest

    I am afraid they see no further than the end of their noses, ie as far as their hate extends.  And that is what a creature like bret feeds on; he must have had an awful childhood to end up as he has.   Someone who knows him says he is very creepy; you get a cold chill when he passes, as if all the obvious hate he carries with him envelops him like a cloak.   As for the ‘connecting’ cases like the Irwin one and the McCanns is merely because there is no news, no updates, we are at the present in  a kind of limbo.  And many of those trying to link cases are in fact the very ones who have forgotten that lovely child; their whole attention is on the McCanns – a focus for their envy and spite.  Sad, I suppose?

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      So he is one of these you wouldn’t want to meet in a well lit alley, yet alone a dark one on a dark night. LOL

      • Guest

        Would you want to meet Freddy Krueger?  

  • Guest

    Bren,  you wanted more material on this creep? Try the link at the end of this post 
     and see what has been posted up on there, especially many details of his vendetta against the people who wrote a book on Valentino.  And also there are various book reviews on there which may amuse/interest you.
    http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      Thank you for that link, loved the reviews of his books, not very complimentary are they?

      • Guest

        Other than those written by sycophants, I have yet to read a good review of anything he has written.    And he attacks anyone who dares to write a book that is at variance to his own version of events.  He has gone after Errol Flynn’s daughter, Diana Dors’ son, and said of Marlene Dietrich’s daughter that, if he had known Marlene when the child was born, he would have advised her to drown it straight away.    This is about the child of someone he claims was his dearest friend?   And as for the Valentino book, his own bio on that actor was a tissue of made-up stories, half-truths and backstairs gossip.   He says every actor/actress was/is gay and then fabricates his books on that premise.  All are full of sex, perverted and straight, and he has so-called true stories about these long dead idols that are so awful as not to be repeated here.

        • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

          That is his trait, pick on the dead, they can’t defend themselves.  That way he can tarnish their reputation, spice up their life and rip them to shreds if he wants.

          As for books like that, I prefer to read the truth, and I wouldn’t want to read anything from a man who thinks that about a child.

  • Sabot

    Mr. Irwin had a Work Mobile.  He didn’t need to take his own.  Innumerable myths are already surfacing, and have been since Day One.  Just as they did in The McCann Case.
    And don’t imagine that finding these children will put paid to the rumours because it won’t.
    There is a very sick faction of society that feeds on vicious supposition.  The likes of Bret and Bennett just use this for their own ends, making them even more sick.

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      I agree wholeheartedly there Sabot.  I have a friend that used to work for a company and they provided a mobile, due to abuse, as the company stated, they used to make them hand their mobiles in before clocking off.

      And as you said Sabot, if these children were found tomorrow these people would be saying it was just because the police were onto them, they knew they were going to get caught.

      But one thing I can say, whoever orchestrated this propaganda campaign which obviously emanated from Portugal, was clever, because it sure as hell sucked me in into believing that the British Press and Government were not telling us the whole truth and they were protecting the parents.

      To which I am now pleased to say I finally saw through.  There is no cover-up, there is no government backed campaign to protect the parents, half the world and its population are not “In On It”.

      Personally I think a lot of people have seen that and have gone back to their real-life and left the case.  Which is a shame because it is those voices that can make a huge difference in dispelling myths and untruths.

      But there again, I can’t blame them, especially if they knew damn well the abuse they would receive for changing their opinion. It is water of a ducks-back to me now.  Actually I now have this vision that people are sitting at keyboards hurling their abuse in my direction, with steam coming out of their ears. 

  • Guest

    I think the main problem is that some members of the general public seem totally unable to step back and look at themselves and see what horrors they are helping to perpetuate.  Myths feed on myths, lies upon  lies, conspiracies on conspiracies,  misrepresentations upon  misrepresentations, it’s a never-ending circle.  And for many, the net is a great way to bully without the victim suddenly deciding they have had enough and applying a knuckleduster to the attacker’s face.    Bret is a bully of the worse kind, he is erudite, he knows words and he uses them as a really vicious weapon.  Bennett is less capable in this field; instead he alters, misconstrues, even blatantly lies.    The world would be a happier place without people like these, but I am afraid there will always be someone ready to take their place.

  • Sabot

    I was also initially taken in by the propaganda against The McCanns.  And sad to say, again in the case of Meredith Kercher against Amanda Knox and Raphaele Sillecito.  I can only guess that the likes of me just doesn’t expect Law Enforcement to blatantly lie, or to leak incorrect information.  Although certain sick factions don’t even need that.
    Now I only say, “Can you prove that.”    But even this does not go down well with The Witch Hunters, and is likely to get you banned.  I mean, how dare one ask for proof.

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      Exactly Sabot, I want proof now, not spin or I know a friend of a friend whose cousin used to live to the guy that used to live next door to the third cousin, twice removed, from the McCanns, and he said…..

      But again they are failing to recognise the crux of the matter, even though Amanda Knox stood up in Court on that appeal and made her speech in Italian, the whole evidence was once again tested in Court.

      The decision was made on the evidence being tried and tested and being solid enough to convict a person.  The defence proved to the judge that it wasn’t solid and he proved to the Judge that Amanda was innocent, hence the acquittal.

  • Guest

    Some more for you to read Bren:

    http://fr-fr.facebook.com/pages/Pour-que-Brigitte-Bl%C3%A9-se-tappe-une-extinction-de-voix-et-la-ferme-un-peu/143410349023247

    And here he is, pontificating:   [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=cVXWGI6r95I#![/youtube]

  • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

    Not very well liked is he.  Mind you I couldn’t stop laughing yesterday, when he posted his rant and put this paragraph in.

    http://regretsandramblings.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Justice4maddie-guarded-tweets.jpeg

    So there you have it. Painstakingly scroll back through the hundreds of tweets and you will see the guarded messages from “calfie” and “justice4maddie”, posted to Bren Ryan and her cronies. Check out their news feeds. There is even a “justice4maddie” group, which I purposely joined to flush out these people. One post from me asking who “calfie” was, and she appears like grease lightning–for the first time EVER as A***** B****–and pandemonioum erupts.

    Seriously hasn’t he heard of email?  If you were a mole you wouldn’t risk someone finding out by tweeting your information would you? 

    Of course not, not when you can skype, MSN, email it all in secret.  Seriously this man… see’s moles and conspiracies everywhere.

  • Sabot

    It’s “Greased Lightning”  by the way.  And I thought he was educated, sort of.

    On behalf of,  The Spelling and Grammar Police.com

  • Guest

    Bren I think he is doing damage limitation.  The latest on his blog is a disclaimer:

    “I belong to no groups, and I don’t participate in forum banter. Both offer some degree of comfort and camaraderie but neither achieve much at the end of the day. I work alone. That way, if anything goes wrong, there’s only me to blame.”

    No comment!!!

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      As for the “I work alone” comment, I suppose the truth of that  is he has to, cos nobody can bloody stand him.  I know I can’t.

  • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

    Oh yes I was reading that group, my god he was so abusive to people on it.  I couldn’t believe what I was reading, but mind you it was like “Handbags at dawn” at what was transpiring.  Talk about a bitch-fight.

    But last night I saw one tweet, from Ringostarfish and I think they summed it up perfectly:

    @Mobyra I am sick to death of these #McCann haters and their pathetic games – they disgust me and they should be ashamed of themselves.

    http://twitter.com/#!/RingoStarfish/statuses/123519949108023297

    http://regretsandramblings.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ringostarfish-tweet.jpg

    This is not some arcade game or a role-playing game on PS3 or the Wii, this happens to be a real-life family with real feelings and a missing child.  I too am sick of their sick games, inventing accounts on twitter, to bolster their numbers, mocking of a child in their tweets, by using the excuse it is attacking the parents, when they tweet about certain statements.

    In their sick mind maybe they see it as attacking the parents, I see it as the reason the parents are attacked is because of this poor child.  If and when she is found one thing I do know this child would not sanction the attacks on her parents.  No child would.

    • Jaccirdesign

      And here you have the crux of the matter, this is real life, not a PS3 or the Wii game. What you put out there has very real consequences. I truly think that many of the so called anti’s dont get that!

      I think they look at it as a game, them against us. In their sick minds attacking everybody in order to vilify the parents is OK, afterall it a game and they can turn around at anytime and carry on with their lives.

      Sorry about the lives destroyed hey!!!!!!

  • Guest

    This is from Bret and what he says about himself over his book about Errol Flynn:”Even if my book IS rubbish, I am always going to be believed more than such people. I may be a fiction writer, but many more people believe my “made up” stories and buy my books. My career will continue–I’ll keep on “slandering” people and writing crappy books which sell by the shed load…-David Bret “Nice of him to admit openly that he is a sleaze merchant, a liar and a scumbag, isn’t it?

  • Jackspratt

    A tremendous post from a former whore too afraid to show her own face!

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      And who can blame anyone for now revealing their true identity when there are sickos out there.  Just like you.

      And I do hope you have proof to back that statement up, because you see I have never solicited for sex and neither have I ever been a prostitute and for you to say so is libellous and defamatory.  Thank goodness for wordpress and disqus.

      But there again, what do you expect from someone who has to resort to insults and abuse, because their argument is not valid and they have the debating skills of buffoon.

      • Sabot

        May I dispute the word, “Buffoon” please, Bren  I don’t think he is at all amusing.

        “The debating skills of a Bullock”  might be better.  That’s a castrated Bull, by the way.

        • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

          Most certainly you can dispute it Sabot, I got my buffoons muddled up with me baboons there for a minute LOL.

          Mind you I did like one definition of buffoon:

          a person given to coarse or undignified joking.

          • Sabot

            No, no.  Baboon is even better than Bullock.

            Any advance on Baboon, anyone?

          • Guest

            Bratoon?  Bratboon?

          • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

            Well I am beginning to wonder if the blogger named morrissisy might have got it right

            http://www.morrissey-solo.com/members/14318-morrissisy

          • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

            If anyone mentions anything to do with fences I am running straight for the hills.  I still have nightmares about fences, gorillas and some form of oil… and I know it wasn’t Johnsons baby oil

  • Guest

    Watch out for bret on tweeter/facebook as gasparstatement – he won’t stop, you know, even while he pretends to be so innocent.  

  • Guest

    Oh and now there is a DrGaspar2007 bleating on about a journalist and a phone call.  I wonder who that could be?  

  • Sabot

    Oh My God, Bren.  You’ve set off my palpitations again.

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      Oh Sabot, I’ve not been able to sit the garden since, as I am surrounded by 3 6 ft fences LOL.  I don’t know which would be the most traumatic, monkeys and fences or bumping into  Bret or Bennett down a dark alley.

      • Maureen Lang

        Just dress up as a scarecrow.  They’ll both think it’s the other one.

        • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

          Yes but how do I explain the lack of shopping trolley? ROFL

          Solved it off to Lidl’s or Aldi to see if they have one in bargin basement.

          • Sabot

            Has Bret got a trolly as well?  Or is he just off it.

          • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

            Just off it Sabot… As for Bennett’s trolley, I think after three potential court appearances it could be put to rest, never to see daylight again.

  • Sabot

    It’s wheels are going to drop off.  Leave it to me, Bren   It’s all in hand.

  • samantha
  • Davies

    With his name you never really know what your getting, one day David Bret, David Spurr the next and then David Marleau the next week……But with the man himself you DO know what you getting – an extremely nasty bigot who hides behind his blogs immersed in his own self loathing……

    His treatment of the McCanns has been disgusting, and those who have supported them in their quest of finding their daughter – and this from a man who “claims” to be a “Lover of Nice People”. I’m under the impression he’s writing about the cardboard cutouts of his beloved Dorothy, Piaf, Dalinda and George Formby. Who like the waxworks in Sunset Boulevard sit motionless at Mr Bret’s dinner table listening to the mad man’s rantings.

    Sadly the McCanns have been added to a “huge” list of innocents who have been harrassed, bullied and abused by the rantings of a complete non-entity. David Bret despite his claims ISN’T an author, a broadcaster, a raconteur or a profiler, as writing crap doesn’t make you an International Author, A telephone call to a Radio Station DOESN’T make you a broadcaster, talking s*** doesn’t make you a raconter and being a file clerk with the NHS doesn’t make you a profiler. But what this does give you is the insight of Man who believes the “grandeur” of his made-up life and career.

    A career which has been on life support since he released his book on Joan Crawford. Subsequent books on Diana Dors and Elizabeth Taylor and Clark Gable failed to set the charts alight – and before you start claiming to be a best-selling author Mr. Bret the only chart you have scored “highly” on is with Amazon, which isn’t really a mean feat, especially when you have to buy most of your own books. The saddest fact about Mr David Bret is that he really believed that by “latching” onto the McCann case he could continue a career, of sorts – and now the fact that The Sun named and shamed him hammered the penultimate nail in his coffin, the last nail he drove himself at the weekend by comparing the Keith Bennett case against Madeline and the McCanns. To say that Bret is a sick B****** is an understatement.

    I thought I’d add my six pence worth, and please keep up the good work, and you too Samantha.

    • Sabot

      Jolly well said.  Whoever you are.

      Just hope I don’t start feeling sorry for him.

      • Davies

        Many thanks Sabot . After The Sun named and shamed David Bret I was left astounded by the amount of abuse that he had directed at not just the McCanns, but also the general public.

        One would have hoped that he would have learnt after all the forums that he has harrassed in the past – but oh no, Mr Bret believes that he is bigger that the internet itself. And yet despite his claims that he’s NOT a member of forums etc, well yet again it’s pure lies, as we all know whether posting under his own name or that of his “others” it’s well known that he spends his days “stalking” the internet doing his Google searches, typing  D.a.v.i.d B.r.e.t to see who’s writing about him. On the Morrissey forum he had about 4 or 5 identities and still he got removed for all the crap he was writing about them, it was the same with the Mario Lanza forums, aswell as Dusty Springfield etc….. 

        • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

          One thing that I am curious about, does he do this to get reactions, because nobody likes having nasty things written about them.  Surely he knows what he is doing?  Can he be that sad that he has to carry on like this, because he knows he would never be noticed otherwise.

          I think on twitter he has numerous ID’s but I noticed that he got more horrid in his posts once the Sun named him.  That seemed to be light his blue touch paper and he exploded with his posts and the hatred just oozed from them.

          I notice he is causing trouble on Facebook in the groups, and he definitely reminds me of the naughty child that will do anything just to get noticed and be the centre of attention.

          • Davies

            As you may know he has a way of twisting the truth, so with much of the stirring he does really is for his own amusement. He makes the claim that anyone who “hurts” his friends beware . . . . . . which makes the runt sound like a school yard bully. Que Cherrett is one of his many ID’s.

            His “relationships/friendships” with stars are pure fabrication. One that was mention in one of his books as being an influence etc, when asked how they knew David Bret, their response was “Who?” even when explained the supposed link, it still drew a blank.

            At the end of the day David Bret should ask himself where all his celebrity friends were when The Sun named and shamed him…..I’ll give him a clue, carrying on with their lives, with their friends and families, reveling in peace of mind and love. There could be something in that for him to learn????????

          • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

            He reminds me of one of these people that does all the stirring, lights the blue touch paper and then stands back and claims they are the victim.

            Tough, I can see through him and it cuts no ice with me.  Twats like that are best left to self-destruct on their own.

      • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

        And if nothing else works Sabot and you find you are still feeling sorry for him, think Baboon or Bullock minus his ock

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      Bravo, well said.  You have summed him up perfectly.  The McCanns have been through hell and back and they don’t need people like him adding to their anguish.

      Sabot, my dear, just pinch your self, view a couple of shopping trollys in the argos book and you will return to normality.  I promise.

      And there was I going to have an early night and we have a trainwreck.  God who would think this would transpire.  I wonder who is next for the chop on MM for questioning.

      • Davies

        Thank you Bren. All I can say is that for many years, well as long as he’s had the internet David Bret attempted to make a second career as a poor man’s Perez Hilton, with his blogs…. David Bret has bit, chewed, ate and then spat out the very hands that have feed him and his family. I hope for him that he’s got plenty of cash invested as I don’t believe that any publisher or broadcaster will enter the thought of working with him.
         
        But from what I’ve read via his rantings there is absolutely no way I could “feel sorry or express pity” for a man so immersed in “pure hatred”….. His recent treatment of Brigitte Ble, Evelyn Zumaya and Hala Pickford has been nothing short of disturbing, especially coming from a “Man”. He will have his day in Hell, for that I’m sure

        • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

          I can remember reading a blog a couple of weeks ago, written by Evelyn Zumaya, I can’t find the link now, but what he was saying about her was absolutely despicable.

          Whether she has removed the blog, I don’t know but I think the last thing he did was bring her dead father into the argument.  I was appalled.

          I just could believe what I was reading.  This poor woman must have been at her wit’s end dealing with the torrid of abuse from him.

          Thick skin here and water off a duck’s back as far as I am concerned when he writes about me.  I just go, screencap what he has written, have a chuckle and file it away.

          People like him are immature, childish and nothing but playground bullies.  I have seen better behaviour from toddlers suffering the worst case of the terrible twos.

  • Davies

    It was nothing short of distgusting, the treatment that Ms Zumaya recieved. But with the evidence that has been cached, and with forums such as these it is my great hope that those who may “intend” working with Mr Bret in the future read the words carefully and decide if they want to be linked or represent someone who havs been tagged as being “immoral” . . . . . . Somehow I don’t think so.

  • Graham

    Hello, Davies, I see, like me, you know this creature well.    I first heard of him when I purchased his Errol Flynn book, being a fan of Flynn, and being sickened by his comments.  I had actually bought a load of no-sale books in a charity shop, and chucked them in a cupboard for later reading.  When I got them out I found I had two more of his books.  I was appalled by them.  I then learned about his ongoing vendetta against the writers of the Valentino book, and his fights with Marlene Dietrich’s daughter, Diana Dors’ son and Errol’s daughter, let alone his ongoing slanders re the children of dead celebs who dare to have written books about their parents/s.  A book written by the child of a celeb is likely to do well, look at the Mommy Dearest one by Crawford’s daughter.  

    Books by someone who has never met the subject of their book, who reads National Enquirer and other such rags for gossip, copies other so-called insider stories, hangs about stage doors (I suppose) and generally enjoys muck-racking will not sell as well.  Claims to be ‘a personal friend’ of someone, and then make a remark about wishing he had been there when a child was born and then advised its immediate drowning cannot be taken as true.

    And re Ms Zumaya,  I have never read such evil as he has posted about he, aided and abetted by various acolytes.    But the good news is that the people who once thought he was so wonderful are backing off fast, afraid of contamination and also if Carter Ruck go after him as well.   But he unfortunately is obsessed, and he will not stop, you know, he will continue as he believes blog posting is untouchable.  Well, maybe at present, but who knows in the future?  

    I have decided to log in as Graham rather than Guest, by the way.

    • Graham

      Sorry, hit send button before I changed the name so this is the old Guest  LOL

  • Graham

    Making a hash of this, will try again.  This is Graham, ex guest

    • Guest

      Giving up!  Will end all future  poss with Graham.  LOL

  • Bren

    Morning Graham, yes disqus can be quite temperamental I think what you have to do is make sure you are on the guest one and then when you enter your email addy you have to then change the name.

    I am trying it to see if that is the case.

  • Graham

    Morning Bren, thank you.  I will try and get this one to work.  However just in case I will sign it at the end.

    This comment from the Morrissey forum really sums him  up, doesn’t it?

    “Anonymous - June 21, 2011, 11:42 PM
    I’ve just read the comment made by ******* that they ran into David Bret, who claims that he told them that he doesn’t have a website or a blog?????????? I’m of the impression that David Bret is upto his old tricks yet again? Here is a “world famous biographer” trying at any level to get the attention that the British, actually make that the World media DOESN’T give him.It is a well known fact that when not attending to the images of his beloved Joey Stefano, Bret is stuck like glue to his laptop, searching and searching for innocents to claim as his own……maybe this explains the reason why he resembles Freddy Kruger? The man like his body of work….. is a joke. Who in god’s name would take the words of a ‘mad man’ as gospel, let alone believe him. Emotionally the man is retarded, aswell as lacking in common sense and decency.And despite claims of selling over two million books, can anyone explain why he looks as though he still gets his clothes from the Littlewood’s catalogue. My advice is to ignore the buffoon and allow him to stew in his own evil.

  • Davies

    I see that he has taken down his blog concerning The McCanns, although it may only be for a couple of days. What I find amusing is that for someone who carries on with a “Devil May Care” attitude who believes that he writes NO wrong, would feel the need to do so. By his actions one gets the impression that Mr Bret is smelling the fear.

    • Graham

      It will be up again as soon as the dust settles.  He is so predictable; and such a liar too.   But yes, I think he has realised that his support has dropped to practically zilch; more and more of the ‘anti McCanns’ are seeing through him and realising that he is a NOT A GOOD THING, while the pro-MCanns recognised him as a time-serving, dirty mouthed freak.     Graham

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      Thank god for that, I doubt if there will be many begging him to revive it.  There again maybe there will be some.

      And I think like you it might only be for a couple of days and then it will be back.

      • Graham

        Probably Mike Hardy – is he spudgun?  And Que Cherritt who it seems may not be bret after all.  No signs of Jackspratt on here today?  

        Graham

        • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

          God knows what goes through their minds Graham, I was only just saying on another thread, I have got to the point I just can’t be arsed arguing with them.

          They are blinkered to the truth and they will walk forever and a day along that same blinkered path.

          As for Jackspratt, yes I wonder if they are having a lie in or reflecting on what harm they have caused to people?

          • Graham

            Haven’t you considered who Jackspratt might be, Bren?   As for any of them reflecting on what harm that have done/are doing/will do, I don’t think so; more likely thinking up even nastier ways of hurting people.  

             Graham

          • Sabot

            So who is Jack Sprat?  According to his post it must be his real name.
            Can we expect a photograph sometime soon?

          • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

            I was living in hope there Graham that he might have woken up this morning feeling all remorse about what he did.

            But I bet you are right, he is probably planning his next blog and dirty deed.

          • Davies

            Most certainly Mr Bret in my opinion

  • Graham

    If he is who I think he is then he will never give up.  It’s one of his traits to just post once under a false ID and then never return.   Anyway, do you really care?  

    Graham

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      Nope I don’t care, twats like him need ignoring to be honest.  They only survive because of the oxygen we feed them.  I think of him as this annoying little bug that keeps turning up and that gets splattered on his first buzz

  • Sabot

    He, Bret, is plotting a whole new identity as we speak.  And any further books will have to be written under a Pseudonym because no one will now buy his Bret crap anymore.

    Trust me on this one.

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      He could always go into leaflets Sabot, I know a man that might have a leaflet carrier up for sale pretty soon.

      • Sabot

        And a Home Printer in his garage, I wouldn’t be surprised.  We never did see the bills for all that printing that was done for The Floundation when Bennett was flogging Leaflets and Books sic.

        He buys ISBN Numbers you know.  And sometimes uses them more than once.

  • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

    I see Mr Bret has reared his head on my Facebook wall.  Well as I have now blocked you. However, I will post here the comments I have made to your veiled threats….

    http://regretsandramblings.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/David-Bret-on-Facebook.jpg

  • Davies

    Interesting he claims that “WE” sued Hala Pickford for $100,000 etc, when the court case was between Hala and someone else. The issue between Mr Bret and Ms Pickford was a completely different case . . . .I’m beginning to think he may suffer from forgetfulness . . All he has to do is go back and re-check the nonsense he was written previously. But then again in BretsWorld nonsense is the same as fact. And if he’s using that old chestnut “about courts, libel etc etc”, I think he’ll find a huge line of people with evidence suggesting that Mr Bret is guilty on all counts. The best thing he can do is pack his laptop away, take a book, have a good read, maybe prehaps have a conversation with his cardboard cut-outs, than waste his time making ‘veiled’ threats especially when the proof is in the public domain…..

    • Graham

      He’s not forgetful, believe me, but obsessed.   He is fixated on the idea he is the best – and then makes a comment like he did re his Errol Flynn book, that he writes fiction and that sells (see post above).  He cannot bear rivalry and his only weapon is to revile and denigrate anyone who so much as dares to write a book on someone he has  or is going to write about.   He is such a nasty individual.    Graham

      • Davies

        Very true Graham. On his blog last week I was appalled to read his latest ranting on the teenage girl from Australia, claiming that he had read her Facebook wall . . . . surely that is a form of stalking, and even worse how in Gods name (that’s if her account was privatised) was he able to view???? The man is really the lowest form of a non-entity that there is. And it seems that it’s not only the general public that have been battered by the repulsive Bret, he even bragged about hasselling the actress Jane Horrocks when she and her husband made “Gracie” it seems that Mr Bret has the full and complete license over Gracie Fields, as well as Errol Flynn, Joan Crawford, Clark Gable, Diana Dors and as for his treatment of the fans of his “Old pal” Morrissey - well put it this way it all goes the same route as all his temper tantrum’s. His poor wife she must be sick of sending him to bed at 5.30pm without any dinner….But ‘bold boys’ need to be punished and taught right from wrong. 

  • Guest

    While we all think Bennett is just a lunatic, Bret is evil and sinister. It’s quite scary the depths he will go to in attacking anyone that supports the search for Madeleine. Everyone (even children) are fair game to him. That in itself tells you that he doesn’t care one bit about Madeleine. In that instance, he’s just like Bennett–after his 15 minutes of fame. I say if he truly wants fame then the likes of Tracey from the Express should do a great story on him. Then he will have all the attention he deserves. 

    Bren, you didn’t mention that Bret is now calling himself a “profiler”.

    I’m glad you have come to support the McCann family and most of all Madeleine. 

    • Graham

      “Bret is evil and sinister. It’s quite scary the depths he will go to in attacking anyone ……… ”   ANYONE is the operative word.  His attacks on people who have written bios about the same person as he has are quite unbelievable.   It wouldn’t be so bad (I suppose) if he was even slightly witty in his attacks, but no, he uses foul language and explicit sexual innuendoes every time.  He digs up dirt and if he can’t find any, he makes it up, just like in his ‘books’.  He is an opportunist which is why he latched onto  the McCanns.   And he will, as I have said before, keep going back again and again to the same tired filth.   

      Graham

  • Davies

    I think David Brets remarks via his blog really prove just how spineless he really is. After all this is the same man who states via his website the following:

    By way of contrast, Bret has little patience with fan-based forums.  His books sell in large quantities, therefore the majority of fans of whoever the book is about greatly approve of the way he has tackled his subject. However, every star has his or her fanatics–a thankfully minuscule group of individuals who need to see their idol as they want to see them, and not as they really were. These fanatics post one-star reviews on the Amazon retail sites, or lambast Bret on their forums–it has become a popular  pastime for some detractors!
     
    Bret has a tradition of NEVER attacking anyone unless they attack him first, but when he makes his move–his Blog are notorious–he takes absolutely no prisoners. “They have a go at me,” he says, “And they are flabbergasted at the way I bite back. Then they complain about me, when it was they who started the attack in the first place!”
    This written by the same “Man” who posted a huge quantity of disgusting comments on Amazon when he recieve one-or-two star reviews. Thankfully Amazon.com  had the good sense to stop him from commenting on reviews about his book. And as for the claim of NEVER attacking anyone unless they attack him first – someone get that man a job on stage, prefably cleaning it!

    The more this man writes, the more he believes he is in the same league as “those great stars” he claims to have befriended, the more he believed he’s untouchable. Actually he believes that he is some kind of Messiah – preaching bull-nonsense and when questioned by those who know the facts, he goes on the defensive – like some wounded parrot. Well thankfully Mr Bret has now been outed for what he really is “A racist, predjuiced homophobic social leper”. And one phrase that he may wish to take heed of is “People who live in glass-houses, shouldn’t throw stones”.

    • Davies

      Apologies for the comment that was removed.

      • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

        No worries, just didn’t want to give him some ammunition to use against members of this blog.  

        I could this of few choice words for himself, but it wouldn’t be lady-like to post them. LOL

  • Fitzrovia

    I see that yesterday he went after someone again and that you were mentioned, Bren, along with another blog owner as allowing filth on your sites., which is a ‘laugh a minute’ as he spits venom and expletives all the time.   I think maybe his not being able to read certain blogs/forums is getting to him.  Well, at least he is leaving other more deserving people alone.  

    Graham

  • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

    Hiya Graham, yes I read his posts about “Justice4Maddie” and they are just full of bile and hateful comments.  I think his problem is that a lot of his following have moved over to her side in his petty argument with everyone.

    Oh I bet he knows he is being discussed on various forums and blogs in members only areas and I think that will get to him.

    Personally I have got to the stage with him, that what he writes is full of shite and so abusive, normal sane people will see him for what he is.  A childish man who has to resort to playground bully tactics to try and win an argument and fails miserably every time.

  • Davies

    This is his latest rambling on his blog:

    Sunday, 16 October 2011Musings & Predictions: Y a pas de printemps…. (NOT ACCUSING)Not accusing….just pleasantly musing and half-heartedly predicting.Spring 2012: new editions of books by David Bret and Kate McCann, possible shared press publicists as happened previously. No boast regarding sales figures last time around: Bret won. Spring 2012: alleged libel hearing between a Leicestershire couple and a Portuguese former policeman. Coming up to the fifth anniversary. Time to keep the home fires burning. Will there be another “sighting”?NOT accusing—-merely musing!

    • Davies

      Off his trolley or too many sherbets, maybe both. I dread to think of the hysteria that’s going off in his head when he’s typing this stuff down.

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      Hi Davies, well I can tell him one thing, if the only books on the shelf were his and how to cook without using jars and packets, I will be picking up the cookery book.

      People that know me would know for a fact, cookery and I don’t get on, and the less I have to do the better and I have never purchased a cookery book in my life.  People have bought them for me, but I never use them.

      • Sabot

        You are infamous for it Bren.  Everybody knows you can’t cook.   

        Try a Sausage Casserole .  You buy the sausages and the packet of source, or is it sauce?
        Chop an onion, can you do that?  Do you know what an onion looks like?
        Then stick it in the oven for an hour.  Have you got an oven?
        However, the family might get a bit pissed off with Sausage Casserole after a couple of months.
        More quick recipes to follow if you need them.

        • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

          Yes, I have an oven, unfortunately.

          Got that one (Sausage casserole) covered Sabot,

          http://ukonlinegoodies.com/images/homepride-sausage-casserole-sauce-tin-500g.jpg

          Thanks to Homepride LOL

          • Sabot

            What about Belly Pork with Stuffing?
            Buy the Belly Pork.  It comes sliced if you’ve got a good butcher.
            Also buy a packet of Stuffing which you mix with boiling water.  Have you got a kettle?
            Plaster the afore mentioned stuffing on top of the afore mentioned belly pork.  Cook for about one hour and a half.
            PS.  It doesn’t matter what stuffing, Any of them will do.
            PPS.  I make my own stuffing, but this could be a bit difficult.

  • Davies

    I’m assuming the line he wrote about a new edition of his book being released in 2012, is yet another figment of his imagination. Who’s he trying to kid that any publisher would want to associated with someone who has been outed by not just the national but the International press as being a ‘Troll’? Somehow I don’t think it would be a wise investment ! Somehow I don’t think his last few books sold enough to warrant a re-release. His books on Diana Dors and Elizabeth Taylor were both panned, and not just on Amazon.co.uk And despite his rantings about Hala Pickford’s skill’s at publishing, didn’t he have to publish “Brit Girls of the Sixities” himself via Lulu.com as no-one wanted to touch it with a barge pole? The buffoon really can’t tell fact from fiction!

  • Graham

    It would appear he has climbed back out of the cesspit he inhabits and is spewing his vileness.   He is wishing a poster who has really upset him to die soon – see what he says on his mccannnotaccusingjustasking blog. Err and you get a mention Bren/Nikki!!  
    Graham

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      Yes he is vile and only read the last two posts of his and that was enough before I wanted to shut his awful blog down.  I do wonder what goes through his mind when he blogs, because whatever it is, it definitely is not normal.

      God Graham what the heck is he on about now with Bren-Nikki, oh well I take it I am someone else this week and am influencing someone else in his little mind.  Stupid, vile, odious little man…. and utterly despicable.

  • Graham

    I think he is being ignored by his one-time followers, even the most diehard seem to have left.    So he starts up again, just in case someone will see him.  Unfortunately people do see his posts and will post them up on forums.    He has very few people now he can abuse; you, I assume, because he has seen you at loggerheads with various posters from both sides of the fence.  He really is mad as a bald coot.  Sad, I suppose.  

    • http://regretsandramblings.com Bren

      Very sad, if he is waiting for a reaction from me, then he has got a flaming long wait.   It takes two to argue and I refuse to so perhaps he is best left to argue with himself.  That way he will hear what he wants to hear and not the truth.

  • Davies

    I just read his latest blog – titled ” A Mother’s Message To The Nation”. Not only does he remind that he DOESN’T like Kate McCann, but that he does not follow any pro or anti groups? Is he for real you may very well ask? This is the same man who is constantly posting comments and links to several Facebook pages.

    Even more laugable is the claim he makes that he was made a scapegoat by a “certain tabloid publication”. Oh and just another rib tickler that he possesses ‘a psychologist’s intuition’.

    Seriously you just can’t the things he write’s up. Did you watch him on Frank Skinner’s BBC4 programme about George Formby. What was hilarious was Bret’s face when obviously relishing in some “dishing the dirt” about Formby in South Africa, suddenly realised that gone a little of board, with a look of horror wanting Skinner to bail him out by agreeing with him. Needless to say the scene was cut short, and that was the last we saw of him. 

Hope you enjoyed reading Regrets and Ramblings..